<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My 2¢ on 3D Cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/</link>
	<description>the personal thoughts, photos &#38; videos of a 20 somthing IT Manager</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 22:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funys.net/?p=738#comment-320</guid>
		<description>I still haven&#039;t seen this in 3D but have heard the same thing about it&#039;s really the depth that is impressive.  The glasses are still the real drawback and I can see that this will be the reason it might still not take off. I did go to a convention (a few years back) and they had TVs with special grills in them so that it actually 3Ds it for you - NO GLASSES. It was incredible as you would just walk past and suddenly see a 3D can of coke spinning. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course you still need to be at 15 degree angles to see it, and you need to be able to see from both eyes. Might be the future though....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still haven&#39;t seen this in 3D but have heard the same thing about it&#39;s really the depth that is impressive.  The glasses are still the real drawback and I can see that this will be the reason it might still not take off. I did go to a convention (a few years back) and they had TVs with special grills in them so that it actually 3Ds it for you &#8211; NO GLASSES. It was incredible as you would just walk past and suddenly see a 3D can of coke spinning. </p>
<p>Of course you still need to be at 15 degree angles to see it, and you need to be able to see from both eyes. Might be the future though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Gillam</title>
		<link>http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Gillam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funys.net/?p=738#comment-319</guid>
		<description>interesting idea but i think the depth effect comes from the closeness of the lenses to the face, at least thats I reckon it must work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting idea but i think the depth effect comes from the closeness of the lenses to the face, at least thats I reckon it must work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funys.net/?p=738#comment-318</guid>
		<description>I commented on a similar article on CMoz&#039;s blog at the end of last week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve never found the format comfortable to watch - it sends my eyes into a painful spasm and I can&#039;t focus on anything.  Bearing in mind that I haven&#039;t seen any of the newer stuff, I don&#039;t know if this will still be the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I almost feel as if this is an advance in technology for the sake of an advance.  Rather than make us all wear glasses, wouldn&#039;t it be easier to have some kind of screen in front of the cinema screen that provides the glasses functionality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I commented on a similar article on CMoz&#39;s blog at the end of last week.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve never found the format comfortable to watch &#8211; it sends my eyes into a painful spasm and I can&#39;t focus on anything.  Bearing in mind that I haven&#39;t seen any of the newer stuff, I don&#39;t know if this will still be the same.</p>
<p>I almost feel as if this is an advance in technology for the sake of an advance.  Rather than make us all wear glasses, wouldn&#39;t it be easier to have some kind of screen in front of the cinema screen that provides the glasses functionality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Gillam</title>
		<link>http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Gillam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funys.net/?p=738#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Avatar would have been good to see, but our cinema only runs 3D a short time it seems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must get modern warfare sometime, i dont often have the spare cash to spend on games but trying to avoid all my games being FPS! :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hear that Nintendo are bringing out a new portable with 3D but not using glasses, will be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avatar would have been good to see, but our cinema only runs 3D a short time it seems.</p>
<p>I must get modern warfare sometime, i dont often have the spare cash to spend on games but trying to avoid all my games being FPS! <img src='http://www.funys.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I hear that Nintendo are bringing out a new portable with 3D but not using glasses, will be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barneyc</title>
		<link>http://www.funys.net/2010/03/29/my-2%c2%a2-on-3d-cinema/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>barneyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funys.net/?p=738#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t seen Alice yet but it&#039;s on the list.  Watched Avatar in 3D and once through the initial 10 - 15 minutes of my eyes/ears/balance all getting synced up it was amazing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve kinda with you on the whole glasses issue though. MrsC found them very uncomfortable over normal glasses and I dislike having my peripheral vision destroyed by big blocky frames at the best of times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Must admit I&#039;m still not convinced on 3D television - yet but for some movies it will really enhance the picture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Me - well I&#039;m just waiting for 3D first person shooters.  Modern Warfare in 3D - yes please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#39;t seen Alice yet but it&#39;s on the list.  Watched Avatar in 3D and once through the initial 10 &#8211; 15 minutes of my eyes/ears/balance all getting synced up it was amazing.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve kinda with you on the whole glasses issue though. MrsC found them very uncomfortable over normal glasses and I dislike having my peripheral vision destroyed by big blocky frames at the best of times.</p>
<p>Must admit I&#39;m still not convinced on 3D television &#8211; yet but for some movies it will really enhance the picture.</p>
<p>Me &#8211; well I&#39;m just waiting for 3D first person shooters.  Modern Warfare in 3D &#8211; yes please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

